implicit return? [R for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2019-04-29 09:40 (442 d 02:02 ago) – Posting: # 20260
Views: 3,679

Hi Hötzi,

Interestingly (at least to moi!), I tried out of curiosity to do this:

 ifelse ((x==0), "foo", "bar")

The benchmark for this version is much, much slower than any of the other proposals (at least on my system). Another example that shows that condensing code towards fewer keystrokes is not always fastest. I wonder what goes on internally since this is much slower? Perhaps space is allocated for both "foo" and "bar" in memory and then there is a decision as to which one to throw away and which one to keep on the CPU stack? I don't have a very good at understanding of these things.

This one is appearing even worse:
 ifelse (x, "bar", "foo")

I have no idea why QWERTY2 would not outperform QWERTY or at least be the same if R has a kind of optimiser in the interpreter. Would you happen know????

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,

"Pass or fail" (D. Potvin et al., 2008)

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
20,834 posts in 4,358 threads, 1,449 registered users;
online 22 (2 registered, 20 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[Those] who have an excessive faith in their theories or in their
ideas are not only poorly disposed to make discoveries, but they
also make very poor observations.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz