Three shades of red [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-04-26 18:27  – Posting: # 20251
Views: 433

Hi nobody,

» I don't think that the problem with such plots is improper decision making based on such plots. It's that you might get the wrong impression from (a quick look at) the plot which prevents from asking the right questions... So: distraction instead of information.

See what Detlew wrote about lies. Now I understand why it is possible in Phoenix/WinNonlin to define two rules to deal with BQLs and/or missings. One for NCA (the real stuff) and another one for plotting. :-|

Couldn’t resist:

[image] [image]

[image] [image]

[image] [image]


[image] [image]

[image] [image]

[image] [image]

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,514 posts in 4,141 threads, 1,336 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 11:37 CEST

I have not failed 700 times. I have not failed once.
I have succeeded in proving
that those 700 ways will not work.    Thomas Alva Edison

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5