Conclusion [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-04-17 15:42  – Posting: # 20184
Views: 1,043

Hi Helmut,

thank you so much for comrehensive answer!

» I corrected a typo in your original post
forgot to execute it on clean environment, sorry!

» So what do you conclude?
pAUC is more sensitive, but the sensitivity is still low (nothing new...)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,567 posts in 4,150 threads, 1,341 registered users;
online 9 (0 registered, 9 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 11:05 CEST

Power. That which statisticians are always calculating
but never have.    Stephen Senn

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5