Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (645 d 15:19 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 4,610

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,308 posts in 4,444 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 23:54 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz