Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34  – Posting: # 20172
Views: 3,348

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,646 posts in 4,328 threads, 1,436 registered users;
online 22 (0 registered, 22 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A little Learning is a dang’rous Thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring:
There shallow Draughts intoxicate the Brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again.    Alexander Pope

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5