Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-16 09:34 (755 d 23:08 ago) – Posting: # 20172
Views: 5,046

(edited by nobody on 2019-04-16 10:39)

...maybe I got you completely wrong, but for me ka ratio varies 48-fold, while cmax ratio only 2.50-fold, pAUC 4.47-fold and cmax/AUC 2.34-fold over the range tested.

So pAUC is indeed the best of all-not-so-wonderful parameters?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,446 posts in 4,483 threads, 1,511 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 08:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The fact that some geniuses were laughed at
does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5