Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 10:15  – Posting: # 20164
Views: 2,623

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,249 posts in 4,261 threads, 1,397 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 21:12 UTC

To call the statistician after the experiment is done
may be no more than asking him to perform a postmortem examination:
he may be able to say what the experiment died of.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5