Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 12:15 (482 d 00:26 ago) – Posting: # 20164
Views: 3,981

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,986 posts in 4,375 threads, 1,460 registered users;
online 23 (1 registered, 22 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 12:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The interpretation of facts in a certain way
stimulates other scientists’ thoughts.    Róbert Bárány

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5