Metrics for absorption [NCA / SHAM]

posted by nobody – 2019-04-15 12:15  – Posting: # 20164
Views: 3,430

Hi

first thought

"Cmax is ...is nonspecific to it (reflects also the extent of absorption as well as the rates of disposition processes),..."

Hmm, how is AUCp not reflecting disposition processes?

"...lacks kinetic sensitivity even following a single administration."

How much sensitivity is needed in the first place? Or are we creating problems by "overly sensitive" methods with no relevance in clinical practice?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,646 posts in 4,328 threads, 1,436 registered users;
online 33 (0 registered, 33 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A little Learning is a dang’rous Thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring:
There shallow Draughts intoxicate the Brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again.    Alexander Pope

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5