Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-03-03 23:07 (573 d 09:02 ago) – Posting: # 19992
Views: 2,981

Dear Akash,

» This is where the 90% CI comes into the equation. There is a (not more than) 5% risk associated with it (1-2*alpha).

My understanding of the reason why: the true T/R ratio cannot be at the same time lower than 0.8 and higher than 1.25. So even if you test the lower limit with a 5 % risk, and the higher limit with a 5 % risk, the overall risk still remains 5 % for the patients, not 10 %.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,076 posts in 4,394 threads, 1,469 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 09:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Politicians use statistics like drunkards use lampposts:
not for illumination, but for support.    attributed to Hans Kuhn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5