Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by akash – India, 2019-02-23 09:39 (1888 d 05:32 ago) – Posting: # 19967
Views: 5,071

Why Bioequivalence testing makes use of the 90 CI why not 95 CI which gives more accuracy?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,653 registered users;
103 visitors (0 registered, 103 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5