Dabigatran EMA - product-specific guide [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-02-14 14:52 (1891 d 08:51 ago) – Posting: # 19920
Views: 4,345

Hi nobody,

❝ ❝ Aren’t you notoriously shouting “It’s the originator, stupid…”?

❝ Could you elaborate on this. No clue what this might mean.


See there.

❝ If you want a duel, choose your weapon

:hungry:


Surströmming?

❝ ❝ I’m more concerned about the first footnote in the guidance […]. Was the EMA’s PKWP not aware of the the FDA’s guidance?


❝ Narrow therapeutic range... maybe in the USA. In the EU there are no mass tort trials...


I don’t like the idea that someone widens the limits for this stuff.

❝ What buys you the widening for Cmax, when both parameters are highly variable? :confused:


Business as usual in all jurisdictions following the EMA’s strange approoach (i.e., WHO; ASEAN States, Australia, Brazil, Egypt, the Russian Federation, the Eurasian Economic Union, New Zealand). At least the WHO initiated a pilot phase for scaling the AUC. For HC widening the limits for AUC is acceptable (no big deal for Cmax; only the PE within 80.0–125.0%).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,654 registered users;
105 visitors (0 registered, 105 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5