About the Partial SS in Boequivalence results in WinNonlin 8.1 [Software]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-11-01 23:49 (1999 d 12:45 ago) – Posting: # 19518
Views: 4,816

Hi Fyy et al.,

I am not a SAS user or a WNL user, but I think the basis for this question may be a little wrong?

In a 222BE trial the result is generally produced with a linear model, not a mixed model, regardless of authority. In that situation the whole concept of denominator df's if irrelevant. The residual df's will be an integer.

So, I am guessing you fit your model with subject as random, and hence it becomes a mixed model.
If I recall correctly WNL happily fits subject as random by default so one may need to actively tell the beast that everything including subject is fixed. Then the analysis becomes compliant with guidelines and expectation, and there will be no denominator df's to confuse you. :-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,990 posts in 4,826 threads, 1,665 registered users;
55 visitors (0 registered, 55 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5