BQL = 0: bad rule [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-07-16 18:02 (2082 d 22:59 ago) – Posting: # 19067
Views: 7,181

Hi Babe_Ruth,

❝ ❝ Bad practice to force BQLs after tmax to zero


❝ What about for sparse sampling methods?


Sparse sampling is another cup of tea. Sounds trivial but actually isn’t.

❝ If there are 3 samples/time point, wouldn't we want to use 3 values for the calculation of the mean concentration? In which case imputing BQL concentrations with a value of 0 or close to 0 would be more favorable than not including the value altogether?


Some ideas:

❝ […] I'm interested in learning more about what I'm doing.


:-D
  Basic research is what I’m doing
when I don’t know what I’m doing.
   Wernher von Braun


❝ Browsing these forums in my spare time really helps me see where others are in environment of the Ba/Be world :) Searching old topics have answered most of the questions I have had, which is super helpful.


Maybe you can convince your employer to browse the forum in your payed time…



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
110 visitors (0 registered, 110 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:01 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5