Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 05:43 CEST

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Old belives die hard [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes - Berlin, Germany, 2018-07-04 13:28  - Posting: # 19020
Views: 957

Dear Detlew,

» » IMHO we don't need an alpha correction for your case above, if we combine the tests with 'and'.
» THX for reminding me (not for the first time)…

Correct.
But old belives die hard :-D

» » Eventually we can miss-use power.2TOST() ...
» » Then of course the question of the correlation parameter rho arises. How to choose?
» Not sure. Whereas two PK metrics are always correlated somehow, IMHO, here it may be different. One formulation doesn’t care how it behaves in relation to the other...

Sounds for me like rho=0 :cool:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,698 posts in 3,983 threads, 1,237 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 6 identified bots]).

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents –
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed