Reliable estimates? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-19 23:12 (786 d 23:48 ago) – Posting: # 18925
Views: 1,492

Hi Babe_Ruth,

» I read in a PK report: "Where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations, AUC is not reported."

Bad English?

» The way I see it, if you only have two sequential concentrations above quantifiable limit, then you can generate a Tmax, but you can't be sure of the accuracy of Tmax, especially if Cmax is barely above quantitation limit of the assay used.

I know that some people report “Cmax” based on two concentrations and “AUC” on three. IMHO, that’s crap. I don’t belong to the club of guideline-addicts butI leave it you counting words like sufficient, reliable, appropriate, accurate

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,026 posts in 4,382 threads, 1,460 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 23:01 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

It has yet to be proven
that intelligence has any survival value.    Arthur C. Clarke

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5