Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 02:01 CEST

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Two-stage design and 'forced bioequivalence' [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Mikalai - Belarus, 2018-06-06 08:28  - Posting: # 18854
Views: 849

(edited by Mikalai on 2018-06-06 08:44)

Dear all,
We plan to conduct a sequential (two stage) BE study, and I am concerned with "forced bioequivalence". Specifically, if we obtain non-equivalent results in the first stage with very low power and should recruit more volunteers, how can we protect ourselves from getting into "forced bioequivalence"? In other words, how can we differentiate between underpowered trials and non-equivalent results in the sequential BE? And how can we put this (protection against "forced bioequivalence") in the protocol not to raise many questions from regulators?
Any suggestions and advice will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Mikalai

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,698 posts in 3,983 threads, 1,234 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 9 identified bots]).

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents –
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed