Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2018-05-22 06:34 CEST (UTC+2h)

FDA Study Population Requirement for BE Studies: Ethics or Science [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Obinoscopy - Nigeria, 2018-05-15 19:31  - Posting: # 18765
Views: 274

Hi Guys,

Was going through the USFDA Guidance Document on Bioequivalence titled Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products — General Considerations (March 2003) which states that:

" vivo BE studies be conducted in individuals representative of the general population, taking into account age, sex, and race. We recommend that if the drug product is intended for use in both sexes, the sponsor attempt to include similar proportions of males and females in the study. If the drug product is to be used predominantly in the elderly, we also recommend that the sponsor attempt to include as many subjects of 60 years of age or older as possible."

For IND and NDAs, I can understand the need for representative population. But for ANDA submissions for the registration of generics, I wonder why there is need for the use of representative population. Is it based on the need for equity (ethics) or for soundness of data (science)?

Or could it be that I misinterpreted the document.



Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
18,275 posts in 3,884 threads, 1,164 registered users;
17 users online (0 registered, 17 guests).

Bones, I want the impossible checked out too.    William Shatner (as James T. Kirk)

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz