Consider 505(b)(2) Pathway [Design Issues]

posted by bebac_fan – US, 2018-05-05 19:08 (2176 d 14:27 ago) – Posting: # 18756
Views: 2,852

I think this would need to go through a NDA/505(b)(2) pathway rather than an ANDA.

In this case, comparative efficacy, rather than BE, will be considered pivotal.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,655 registered users;
96 visitors (0 registered, 96 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5