oral powder with water acceptable? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2018-04-16 16:14 (2174 d 01:36 ago) – Posting: # 18688
Views: 3,666

Hello Christian,

'narrowly failed' suggests that your product may indeed be BE but that you lacked sample size. This scenario if often a candidate for a repeat trial, but it comes down to the specifics and sometimes even national habits.
Can you show the numbers for the CIs?

Having said that, an oral powder is often given with something that isn't chewed. Can you shed a little more light on your previous trial: results, administration, food/water restriction post dose, and so forth?

If your product is approved only along with water, which is indeed a quite possible future outcome if you go down that route, then you may run into some substitution issues such as getting an approval but not the substitution in some countries. Do you aim for a 10.1/2 or a 505(j), or what country(ies)?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
115 visitors (0 registered, 115 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:50 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5