[Opinion] Should the 90% CI for GMR be required to encompass 1 [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2018-03-29 18:52 (2216 d 18:17 ago) – Posting: # 18616
Views: 9,775

So basically he's questioning the validity of FDA's 20% window on BE then...
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,990 posts in 4,826 threads, 1,666 registered users;
53 visitors (1 registered, 52 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5