New Version of FARTSSIE [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ddubins  – Toronto, 2008-05-21 17:59 (6593 d 11:28 ago) – Posting: # 1861
Views: 14,988

Hi everyone,

My sample size program has undergone a few renovations. Version 1.6 is available for download here:
http://individual.utoronto.ca/ddubins/FARTSSIE.xls

Please remember to enable macros, otherwise sample size estimation will not work.

The reason for the most recent version is an addition of a worksheet ("Scaled BE - HVD") which will calculate the scaled bioequivalence limits for each method detailed in the FDA proposal for Highly Variable Drugs, outlined here:
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/04/briefing/4034B1_07_Bioequivalence%20Requirments-Draft.pdf
If method C2 is to go forward, essentially highly variable drugs will get a big break. Provided the Test/Reference ratio is between 95-105%, there shouldn't be a need for more than 40 subjects to attain 80% power. In fact, as the intraCV of the reference increases, the number of subjects required actually decreases asymptotically to 33. The impact on the industry would be massive.

Here is a guide to what the BE limits would look like using method C2, scaled to the intraCV of the reference product:
ISV  SIGwr    Scaled BE     SS  SS(C2)
30%  0.2936  80.00-125.00   39   39
32%  0.3122  78.88-126.78   44   38
34%  0.3307  77.77-128.58   49   37
36%  0.3491  76.70-130.38   54   36
38%  0.3673  75.64-132.20   60   36
40%  0.3853  74.62-134.02   66   36
42%  0.4031  73.61-135.84   72   35
44%  0.4207  72.63-137.68   78   35
46%  0.4381  71.68-139.51   84   35
48%  0.4553  70.75-141.35   91   34
50%  0.4724  69.84-143.19   98   34
52%  0.4892  68.95-145.04  105   34
54%  0.5058  68.08-146.88  112   34
56%  0.5223  67.24-148.73  119   34
58%  0.5385  66.41-150.57  126   33
60%  0.5545  65.61-152.42  134   33
62%  0.5703  64.83-154.26  142   33
64%  0.5859  64.06-156.10  149   33
66%  0.6013  63.32-157.94  157   33
68%  0.6165  62.59-159.77  165   33
70%  0.6315  61.88-161.60  173   33
72%  0.6463  61.19-163.42  181   33
74%  0.6608  60.52-165.24  189   33
76%  0.6752  59.86-167.06  198   33
78%  0.6894  59.22-168.87  206   33
80%  0.7033  58.59-170.67  214   33


Column Headers:
ISV:       IntraCV of reference product (1st column)
SIGwr:     Intrasubject standard deviation of reference product (2nd column)
Scaled BE: Bioequivalence limits scaled using the proposed FDA method C2 (3rd column)
SS:        Sample size using traditional 80-125% limits, given a T/R ratio between 95-105% at
           80% power (4th column)
SS(C2):    Sample size using the scaled BE limits in the third column, given a T/R ratio
           between 95-105% at 80% power (5th column)

Best,

David Dubins

--
David Dubins, Ph.D., B.Eng.
Global Bioequivalence Consulting
Assistant Professor, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy
University of Toronto
---

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
133 visitors (0 registered, 133 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5