Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 22:08 CEST

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

FDA: RSABE for NTID [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Jay - India, 2018-03-26 13:31  - Posting: # 18595
Views: 1,824

(edited by Jay on 2018-03-26 13:50)

Dear all,

In one of the full replicate study of NTID the results are as per below,

Parameters   Swr    95%CI
LnCmax       0.04   0.0001
LnAUC0-t     0.07   -0.003
LnAUC0-inf   0.07   -0.004


The ABE results are as below,

Parameters   T/R    90%CI-L    90%CI-U
LnCmax       97     95         99
LnAUC0-t     99     97         101
LnAUC0-inf   99     97         101


The point estimate is near to 100 and ABE is also within 80% to 125%.

But in SABE, the Cmax criteria is more than 0 i.e. 0.0001 which leads to bioinequivalence.

So can it be scientifically justified the 95%CI of Cmax value as its very borderline to 0 and T/R shows less difference between test and reference.

Thanks

-Jay


Edit: Category and subject line changed; see also this post #1 and #2. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,782 posts in 4,002 threads, 1,256 registered users;
online 11 (3 registered, 8 guests [including 7 identified bots]).

[…] our greatest mistake would be to forget that data
is used for serious decisions in the very real world,
and bad information causes suffering and death.    Ben Goldacre

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed