other than 90% CI in BE study? [R for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-03-15 16:18  – Posting: # 18554
Views: 5,004

Hi roro2907,

» I am just curious as I am reviewing a BE study which has used a 94.12 confidence interval. Do you have any ideas as to why this is?

As Yung-jin assumed it smells of a Two-Stage Design of the Potvin flavour. ;-) It would need a major rewrite of bear because we not only need an option to specify an adjusted α (which is always <0.05) but – if the study proceeded to the second stage – “stage” in the model. BTW, you might face different CIs in the future (see this presentation).

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,437 posts in 4,125 threads, 1,325 registered users;
online 9 (1 registered, 8 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 02:47 CEST

On two occasions I have been asked,—“Pray, Mr. Babbage,
if you put into the machine wrong figures,…
will the right answers come out?”

I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas
that could provoke such a question.    Charles Babbage

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5