Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  2018-06-22 07:51 CEST (UTC+2h)

Reasons to go for Partial and Full Replicate [Design Issues]

posted by kms.srinivas - India, 2018-03-09 05:38  - Posting: # 18506
Views: 857

(edited by kms.srinivas on 2018-03-09 10:15)

Dear Friends,
I am very thankful if you could help me regarding following:
1. In which circumstances, Partial or Full Replicate design should be used?
2. Can we go for 2 way crossover, when ISCV > 30% also?
3. Which is better design? Full or Partial replicate? Why?
4. What is the SAS code for Randomization of Full and Partial Replicates?

Thanks in advance for your response.

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,413 posts in 3,912 threads, 1,175 registered users;
online 40 (0 registered, 40 guests [including 32 identified bots]).

The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability
to understand the exponential function.    Albert Bartlett

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed