Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 03:10 CEST

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Reasons to go for Partial and Full Replicate [Design Issues]

posted by kms.srinivas - India, 2018-03-09 05:38  - Posting: # 18506
Views: 1,105

(edited by kms.srinivas on 2018-03-09 10:15)

Dear Friends,
I am very thankful if you could help me regarding following:
1. In which circumstances, Partial or Full Replicate design should be used?
2. Can we go for 2 way crossover, when ISCV > 30% also?
3. Which is better design? Full or Partial replicate? Why?
4. What is the SAS code for Randomization of Full and Partial Replicates?

Thanks in advance for your response.

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,698 posts in 3,983 threads, 1,234 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 6 identified bots]).

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents –
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed