Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? [Design Issues]
Hi Iceland II
Sounds good. With highly variable Cmax point estimates are frequently jumping around like hell between studies, but with highly variable AUC the point estimate from pilot should be more reliable/less freakish (with a reasonably high n), right? Didn't have a look at the numbers recently...
Thanks for reply!
(-11.4°C right in front the window... still falling...)
Sounds good. With highly variable Cmax point estimates are frequently jumping around like hell between studies, but with highly variable AUC the point estimate from pilot should be more reliable/less freakish (with a reasonably high n), right? Didn't have a look at the numbers recently...
Thanks for reply!
(-11.4°C right in front the window... still falling...)
—
Kindest regards, nobody
Kindest regards, nobody
Complete thread:
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? nobody 2018-02-27 19:02
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? ElMaestro 2018-02-27 21:42
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea?nobody 2018-02-27 22:47
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? ElMaestro 2018-02-27 22:58
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? nobody 2018-02-28 08:36
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? ElMaestro 2018-02-27 22:58
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea?nobody 2018-02-27 22:47
- Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? ElMaestro 2018-02-27 21:42