Shorter sampling interval in pilot - Good idea? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2018-02-27 23:47 (2243 d 14:01 ago) – Posting: # 18474
Views: 3,057

Hi Iceland II

Sounds good. With highly variable Cmax point estimates are frequently jumping around like hell between studies, but with highly variable AUC the point estimate from pilot should be more reliable/less freakish (with a reasonably high n), right? Didn't have a look at the numbers recently...

Thanks for reply!

(-11.4°C right in front the window... still falling...)

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,655 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5