Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2018-05-21 13:04 CEST (UTC+2h)

The mysterious ρ -between or within studies [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes - Berlin, Germany, 2018-02-11 19:21  - Posting: # 18399
Views: 2,264

Dear Helmut,

» Yep, then I expect a high correlation (based on my limited knowledge of PK). For my data sets I get with
» pearson <- cor.test(log(study$AUC), log(study$Cmax))
» rho[set, "estimate"] <- pearson$estimate
» rho[set, "lower"]    <- as.numeric(pearson$[[1]]
» rho[set, "upper"]    <- as.numeric(pearson$[[2]]
» summary(rho, digits=5)
»     estimate           lower               upper     
»  Min.   :0.20123   Min.   :-0.094923   Min.   :0.40858
»  1st Qu.:0.70335   1st Qu.: 0.516584   1st Qu.:0.82721

»  Median :0.81713   Median : 0.677607   Median :0.89959
»  Mean   :0.77413   Mean   : 0.633948   Mean   :0.86544
»  3rd Qu.:0.90122   3rd Qu.: 0.827646   3rd Qu.:0.94461
»  Max.   :0.98928   Max.   : 0.977336   Max.   :0.99494

Thanks for that numbers.

» Another question: What is a “similar experiment”?

Good question. Another question. Duno. Pilot study?
For me the hole rho story is a mystery. And rather academic.
Nobody is acting according to that theory. Not at least because the understanding of what value rho shoud have or how it could be estimated.

Taking the greater sample size from the two estimations worked in the past. So what?
Theoretically this would be the case if rho ~ 1 since then the combined power of the two TOST is the minimum of the individual powers. That would be my favoured candidate :-D.
Be warned: rho=1 throws an error in sampleN.2TOST().



Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
18,269 posts in 3,882 threads, 1,161 registered users;
13 users online (0 registered, 13 guests).

Science is wonderfully equipped to answer the question “How?”
but it gets terribly confused when you ask the question “Why?”    Erwin Chargaff

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz