‘Deep’ bug [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-01-05 01:37 (3083 d 16:45 ago) – Posting: # 18147
Views: 16,026

Hi Mittyri,

❝ As I see the problem is in quantile function, looks like approximation is not correct for low DF.


Wow!

R:
for (df in 1:7) cat(sprintf("%9.6f", qt(0.025, df, lower.tail=FALSE)), "\n")
12.706205
 4.302653
 3.182446
 2.776445
 2.570582
 2.446912
 2.364624


Spreadsheets:
M$-Excel 2000   OO Calc 4.1.1   Gnumeric 1.12.15
  12.706150       12.706205         12.706205
   4.302656        4.302653          4.302653
   3.182449        3.182446          3.182446
   2.776451        2.776445          2.776445
   2.570578        2.570582          2.570582
   2.446914        2.446912          2.446912
   2.364623        2.364624          2.364624


tinv(x, y) was introduced as a custom function in PHX/WNL v6.4. Hence, no checking possible in earlier versions. However:
   v6.4       v7.0       v8.0  
12.706205  12.706205  12.706205
 4.302653   4.302653   4.302653
 3.1824
35   3.182435   3.182435
 2.776445   2.776445   2.776445
 2.570582   2.570582   2.570582
 2.446912   2.446912   2.446912
 2.364624   2.364624   2.364624


Since in my example both the estimate and its standard error are correct, something must be wrong ‘behind the curtains’ in PHX/WNL when calculating the CI.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5