Stop estimating post hoc power! [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-12-26 14:11 (1208 d 21:33 ago) – Posting: # 18087
Views: 29,451

Hi kms.srinivas,


I know this post-hoc power business can be very tricky.

Try and ask yourself which question post-hoc power actually answers. Try and formulate it in a very specific sentence.

Generally, [given a statistical model] power is the chance of showing BE in a trial if your expectations about GMR, CV are correct when you use N subjects.
Choice of GMV, CV and N to plug in a power calculation is up to the user, but in the specific case of post-hoc power stats software may make such a choice for you without asking. Often it is 95% or 100% regardless of what you observed in the previous trial.

So with this in mind try and look back in your figures and tell which question the post-hoc calculation in your case gave an answer to. Feel free to paste your numbers here then I am sure someone can help working it out. You might get surprised.:-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,509 registered users;
online 17 (0 registered, 17 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 12:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5