calculation of 90% CI for continuous variable in clinical endpoint studies [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by DavidManteigas – Portugal, 2017-11-21 11:01 (2337 d 20:06 ago) – Posting: # 17996
Views: 4,771

Hi GM,

As El Maestro explained, when your test hypothesis is a ratio (multiplicative model) then you must work with ln transformed data. The guidance is clear on that as it also defines the acceptance range as 0.8 to 1.25 (multiplicative model). If in some guideline they state the hypothesis as treatment differences (H0: u1-u2=0) and a symmetric equivalence range (0.8 to 1.2) then they would be suggesting an analysis on untransformed data. This is true regardless of the type of your endpoint as long as it is a continuous endpoint. As simple as that ;-)

Regards,
David

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,651 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5