Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2018-02-24 00:55 CET (UTC+1h)
 

Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody - 2017-11-14 08:11  - Posting: # 17978
Views: 1,005

IANAL, but I think what San-Diego-man is proposing is to calculate BE-outcome (pass/fail) after stage 1 and compare it to BE-outcome after the (unnecessary) second stage for, let's say, 1 gazillion of studies and see if there is a meaningful difference.

Isn't this a special example of the more general "forced BE" theme in one-stage designs?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,939 Posts in 3,821 Threads, 1,122 registered users;
22 users online (0 registered, 22 guests).

In general, scientific progress calls for no more
than the absorption and elaboration of new ideas –
and this is a call most scientists are happy to heed.    Werner Heisenberg

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed