Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  2018-06-20 11:50 CEST (UTC+2h)

Nope [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by nobody - 2017-11-14 08:11  - Posting: # 17978
Views: 1,662

IANAL, but I think what San-Diego-man is proposing is to calculate BE-outcome (pass/fail) after stage 1 and compare it to BE-outcome after the (unnecessary) second stage for, let's say, 1 gazillion of studies and see if there is a meaningful difference.

Isn't this a special example of the more general "forced BE" theme in one-stage designs?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,397 posts in 3,909 threads, 1,174 registered users;
online 36 (2 registered, 34 guests [including 23 identified bots]).

The analysis of variance is not a mathematical theorem,
but rather a convenient method of arranging the arithmetic.    R.A. Fisher

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed