Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2018-02-24 00:57 CET (UTC+1h)

GMP: EMA and FDA – mutual recognition of inspections [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ElMaestro - Denmark, 2017-11-10 19:10  - Posting: # 17970
Views: 648

Hi all,

I am so worried because of all this.

They make it sound like unnecessary inspections are the big problem and that this agreement is the method to get rid of the problem. It sounds right, sensible use of resources, almost LEAN, tax payers money at work, blahblahblah.

But in fact I have never heard of unnecessary inspections, not even when FDA and EMA 'by chance' have been at the same place more or less simultaneously. Especially not when FDA and EMA 'by chance' have been at the same place more or less simultaneously, actually.

I am totally afraid this means less inspections overall, and that would absolutely be a step in the wrong direction. Fraud is on the rise and it is big business - as it is now, it makes good sense to cheat or cut corners because the chance of getting caught is small to state it bluntly. The financial gain is extremely high, unless you just happen to be unlucky enough to get caught.

You will see me happy and singing and dancing when I see inititative towardsA good weekend to all of you.

I could be wrong, but…

Best regards,

- Bootstrapping for dissolution data is a relatively new hobby of mine.

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,939 Posts in 3,821 Threads, 1,122 registered users;
25 users online (0 registered, 25 guests).

In general, scientific progress calls for no more
than the absorption and elaboration of new ideas –
and this is a call most scientists are happy to heed.    Werner Heisenberg

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz