just y=ax+b [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by nobody – 2017-10-09 12:45 (2361 d 22:45 ago) – Posting: # 17882
Views: 16,332

Best guess: in case of unweighted linear regression the highest calibrators always have the highest impact. For your example: Take 138 dBA as the mean of the regression function, as predictions will be best arround the mean.

If there is heteroscedastic data and weighted regression, the calibrators arround the weighted mean will have least impact on the calibration function.

I still have not fully understood the scope of the survey. Is it on best practice of study planning for calibration experiments?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,640 registered users;
86 visitors (0 registered, 86 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:31 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shows a lack of mathematical education more
than an overly precise calculation.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5