Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  2018-06-20 11:07 CEST (UTC+2h)

just y=ax+b [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by nobody - 2017-10-09 10:45  - Posting: # 17882
Views: 2,683

Best guess: in case of unweighted linear regression the highest calibrators always have the highest impact. For your example: Take 138 dBA as the mean of the regression function, as predictions will be best arround the mean.

If there is heteroscedastic data and weighted regression, the calibrators arround the weighted mean will have least impact on the calibration function.

I still have not fully understood the scope of the survey. Is it on best practice of study planning for calibration experiments?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,396 posts in 3,909 threads, 1,175 registered users;
online 38 (1 registered, 37 guests [including 21 identified bots]).

The analysis of variance is not a mathematical theorem,
but rather a convenient method of arranging the arithmetic.    R.A. Fisher

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed