Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 10:25 CEST

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

just y=ax+b [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by nobody - 2017-10-09 10:45  - Posting: # 17882
Views: 5,556

Best guess: in case of unweighted linear regression the highest calibrators always have the highest impact. For your example: Take 138 dBA as the mean of the regression function, as predictions will be best arround the mean.

If there is heteroscedastic data and weighted regression, the calibrators arround the weighted mean will have least impact on the calibration function.

I still have not fully understood the scope of the survey. Is it on best practice of study planning for calibration experiments?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,782 posts in 4,002 threads, 1,260 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 12 identified bots]).

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed