Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 05:34 CEST

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

just y=ax+b [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by nobody - 2017-10-09 10:45  - Posting: # 17882
Views: 4,803

Best guess: in case of unweighted linear regression the highest calibrators always have the highest impact. For your example: Take 138 dBA as the mean of the regression function, as predictions will be best arround the mean.

If there is heteroscedastic data and weighted regression, the calibrators arround the weighted mean will have least impact on the calibration function.

I still have not fully understood the scope of the survey. Is it on best practice of study planning for calibration experiments?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,697 posts in 3,982 threads, 1,233 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 12 identified bots]).

I have had my results for a long time:
but I do not yet know how I am to arrive
at them.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed