just y=ax+b [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by DavidManteigas – Portugal, 2017-10-09 12:34 (2388 d 04:29 ago) – Posting: # 17881
Views: 16,400

Dear El Maestro,

That is changing the logic of statistics :-D Find the right data for your model instead of finding the right model for your data.

For those models, I think R squared is the way to go, although different sample sizes might have an influence depending on the range of samples that you have. How "small" are the samples? Between 30 and 50 observations per sample? Would methods like cross-validation work on the datasets?
What about calculating confidence intervals for the adjusted R squared of each model and use a Forest plot of those CI, one line for each dataset? This might give you an idea of the impact of the different sample sizes in this particular problem and to decide whether just looking at R square would be enough. Depending on the number of datasets, visual inspection and influence statistics might help on deciding which is the best data for the model. :-D

Regards,
David

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,991 posts in 4,827 threads, 1,647 registered users;
72 visitors (1 registered, 71 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5