Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-12-14 01:44 CET (UTC+1h)
 

just y=ax+b [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by DavidManteigas - Portugal, 2017-10-09 10:34  - Posting: # 17881
Views: 906

Dear El Maestro,

That is changing the logic of statistics :-D Find the right data for your model instead of finding the right model for your data.

For those models, I think R squared is the way to go, although different sample sizes might have an influence depending on the range of samples that you have. How "small" are the samples? Between 30 and 50 observations per sample? Would methods like cross-validation work on the datasets?
What about calculating confidence intervals for the adjusted R squared of each model and use a Forest plot of those CI, one line for each dataset? This might give you an idea of the impact of the different sample sizes in this particular problem and to decide whether just looking at R square would be enough. Depending on the number of datasets, visual inspection and influence statistics might help on deciding which is the best data for the model. :-D

Regards,
David

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,558 Posts in 3,759 Threads, 1,090 registered users;
32 users online (0 registered, 32 guests).

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed