Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-12-14 01:44 CET (UTC+1h)
 

just y=ax+b [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro - Denmark, 2017-10-08 17:50  - Posting: # 17878
Views: 1,000

Hi again,

and thanks for looking into it.
It is as simple as this:

x1=c(1,2,3,4,5)
y1=c(10.5, 11.4, 12.6, 13.3, 14.6)

x2=c(1,2,3,4,5)
y2=c(10.3, 11.4,   NA, 13.5, 14.6)

L1=lm(y1~x1)
L2=lm(y2~x2)

summary(L1)
summary(L2)


I would like to know how to judge if the correlation is quantitatively appearing to be best for the first line or for the second line.

I could be wrong, but…


Best regards,
ElMaestro

A potentially biased estimator may be a relevant estimator. The case of REML speaks volumes.

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,558 Posts in 3,759 Threads, 1,090 registered users;
31 users online (0 registered, 31 guests).

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed