Goodness of fits: one model, different datasets [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by nobody – 2017-10-07 16:03  – Posting: # 17872
Views: 13,172

Hi Danmark!

» ... I am very poor at explaining what I think I am looking for :crying: but I would call it a »"fit likelihood" or "correlation statistic that is sample size corrected"...

Ehhm, whut? Maybe you are to fixated for statical testing? How about some oldfashioned "visual inspection of fit" paired with "back-calculated value of calibration samples from calibration function, including relative deviation"?

Just saying ;-)

No idea what you want to compare in the end, so...

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,514 posts in 4,141 threads, 1,336 registered users;
online 13 (0 registered, 13 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 04:45 CEST

I have not failed 700 times. I have not failed once.
I have succeeded in proving
that those 700 ways will not work.    Thomas Alva Edison

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5