Determination of calibration range [Bioanalytics]

posted by nobody – 2017-10-04 21:10 (2385 d 22:40 ago) – Posting: # 17857
Views: 8,286

Range for calibration is given by the maximum concentrations you expect (upper limit) and the reasonably achievable LLOQ, determined by the LLOD as well as the clinical need to determine such low concentrations. So it depends on your study design (dose, population etc.) and the goal you want to achieve (preclinical, pilot, screening, or pivotal study).

The larger the range you cover, the more likely you will NOT find your data set to be homoscedastic (i.e. equal variance over the concentration range), which is a necessary prerequisite for simple linear regression to be used. Normally you will find a rather constant CV% over a large part of your calibration range. Here you use weighted linear regression. This will massively improve accuracy of your calculated concentrations at the lower end of your calibration curve.

Non-linear methods are not regularly necessary for typical instrumental analytics. These come more into play with stuff like ELISA, radio-receptor assays and stuff like that.

Hope that help.

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,651 registered users;
44 visitors (0 registered, 44 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5