Odd QC values but not outliers [Bioanalytics]

posted by Thi Nguyen – Australia, 2017-09-18 16:43 (2410 d 19:21 ago) – Posting: # 17814
Views: 5,417

Dear all,

I tried to look through all related topics in the forum and found some questions very closed with my issue, however, I could not get the final answer. Could you please advise what I should do in my case: My lab is validating a method for a compound in human plasma. Two core runs have been done (by 2 different analysts), QCs in 3 levels low, medium and high (6 replicates at each level) past with flying colours (all around 100% for accuracy). No carry-over observed. BUT: core run 1 has one LLOQ 498% and one LLOQ 727%, the other four LLOQs have good accuracy 〜100%. Core run 2 has five LLOQs with accuracy 〜100% and one LLOQ 3000%. For core run 2, 3000% can be regarded as outlier (from Grubb's test - calculated by Prism) but for core run 1, both values 498% and 727% are not outliers.

We couldn't figure it out whether there are any sample processing errors so we could't exclude those values from accuracy and precision calculation for LLOQ, it means the core run 1 failed.

We stop validation at this point to have investigation. Much appreciated if you can help with any clues for this situation.

Thanks and best regards,
Thi Nguyen

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,655 registered users;
119 visitors (0 registered, 119 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5