loop ↔ vectorized ↔ direct [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-08-20 19:22 (2433 d 18:18 ago) – Posting: # 17726
Views: 27,520

Hi Hötzi,

❝ I don’t understand why you use vectors at all. What ’bout:

df <- Nps*2-2

❝ if (!Is.St2) {

❝   q  <- qt(p=1-alpha1, df=df)

❝ } else {

❝   df <- df-1
❝   q  <- qt(p=1-alpha2, df=df)

❝ }



Simple, but I think I aready told you: qt is a computationally very expensive function. If we need "many" qt values then it makes much more sense in terms of computation to cache the well-defined ones.

Within the 1000000 iterations values from qt are needed many times, but each of them have defined ranges of DF's (up to the max number of subjects -3 [or 2:-)]) and alphas (two levels). Thus we make a cache of qt values prior to entering the iteration loop then we can just take a sample from the cache in stead of re-inventing the wheel for every call. Do the population of the arrays once, and rely on them during the iterations or whatever other functions that need them. The speedup can be massive both in R and in C.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,664 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5