Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size?

CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by ElMaestro - Denmark, 2017-08-07 23:04 - Posting: # 17679
Views: 326

Hi nobody,

» Any thoughts on this approach?

What a load of absolute nonsense.

And it is of a dangerous kind because it:

1. Misleads the guys with spreadsheets into cheaper but seemingly better studies.
2. Increases the likelihood of failure.
= it increases the risk of futile exposure of volunteers.

I am serious, this is deeply problematic cf. e.g. the Helsinki Declaration and the general GCP principles. This is much worse than the recent Midichloria case.
Check the reference list in that publication for a good laugh, by the way.

Edit: Background “Predatory Journals Hit By ‘Star Wars’ Sting” [Helmut]

—
I could be wrong, but…

Best regards,
ElMaestro

- since June 2017 having an affair with the bootstrap.

Complete thread:

CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? - nobody, 2017-08-07 17:14 [Power / Sample Size]
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? - Helmut, 2017-08-07 18:40
  - CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? - nobody, 2017-08-07 19:52
    - Crap… - Helmut, 2017-08-07 20:29
      - Crap… - nobody, 2017-08-07 21:31
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? - ElMaestro, 2017-08-07 23:04
  - CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? - nobody, 2017-08-08 10:06
- CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? - jag009, 2017-08-09 06:21
  - CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? - nobody, 2017-08-09 17:11