Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-08-17 01:38 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody - 2017-08-07 19:52  - Posting: # 17675
Views: 368

» » Any thoughts on this approach?
»
» Outright bizarre.

Good, so I'm not alone...

» Since the authors are of a CRO, maybe the love failed studies in order to repeat them? Do you have a copy to share?

Would not spend a single cent on such a nonsense. How does somethink like that survive peer review?

Now that is published it will be referenced and used as "scientific basis" for further conclusions/studies. Nightmare. How to get such trash retracted?

***deeply depressed***

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,199 Posts in 3,683 Threads, 1,054 registered users;
26 users online (0 registered, 26 guests).

To call the statistician after the experiment is done
may be no more than asking him to perform a postmortem examination:
he may be able to say what the experiment died of.    R.A. Fisher

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed