Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  2018-07-20 11:28 CEST (UTC+2h)

CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody - 2017-08-07 19:52  - Posting: # 17675
Views: 3,101

» » Any thoughts on this approach?
»
» Outright bizarre.

Good, so I'm not alone...

» Since the authors are of a CRO, maybe the love failed studies in order to repeat them? Do you have a copy to share?

Would not spend a single cent on such a nonsense. How does somethink like that survive peer review?

Now that is published it will be referenced and used as "scientific basis" for further conclusions/studies. Nightmare. How to get such trash retracted?

***deeply depressed***

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,547 posts in 3,941 threads, 1,192 registered users;
online 18 (1 registered, 17 guests [including 13 identified bots]).

If there is an exception to any rule,
and if it can be proved by observation,
that rule is wrong.    Richard Feynman

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed