Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-10-17 02:06 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by nobody - 2017-08-07 19:52  - Posting: # 17675
Views: 973

» » Any thoughts on this approach?
»
» Outright bizarre.

Good, so I'm not alone...

» Since the authors are of a CRO, maybe the love failed studies in order to repeat them? Do you have a copy to share?

Would not spend a single cent on such a nonsense. How does somethink like that survive peer review?

Now that is published it will be referenced and used as "scientific basis" for further conclusions/studies. Nightmare. How to get such trash retracted?

***deeply depressed***

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,394 Posts in 3,725 Threads, 1,071 registered users;
29 users online (0 registered, 29 guests).

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed