Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-08-17 01:39 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

CVintra for Cmax > AUC, therefore use AUC for sample size? [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2017-08-07 18:40  - Posting: # 17674
Views: 379

Hi nobody,

» Found this here:
» https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257283
» […] if I understand this correctly, the authors say, CVintra for Cmax is generally higher than for AUC, therefore use AUC to estimate the sample size of your study.

Ah – the formerly pink, now black journal. ;-)

» Did I get this right?

At least this is what the last sentence of the abstract says: “Hence, CV derived from AUC instead of Cmax should be used in sample-size calculation to achieve a sufficient, yet practical, test power.
”

» Any thoughts on this approach?

Outright bizarre. Since the authors are of a CRO, maybe the love failed studies in order to repeat them? Do you have a copy to share?

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,199 Posts in 3,683 Threads, 1,054 registered users;
27 users online (0 registered, 27 guests).

To call the statistician after the experiment is done
may be no more than asking him to perform a postmortem examination:
he may be able to say what the experiment died of.    R.A. Fisher

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed