Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-10-17 02:07 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

forced BE? [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2017-08-07 14:00  - Posting: # 17669
Views: 906

Hi ElMaestro,

» That is indeed why we need to apply more bootstrapping in BE.

Duno whether we need it. Of course, one can do it since the GL only speaks about “an appropriate sample size calculation.” Whatever that might be.

» It, too, tells what sample size we need, but in contrast to ordinary power calcs it allows one to take into account that residuals may not be normal even though the evaluation itself makes that assumption.

Right. But IMHO, the quality of bootstrapping depends on the input. Remember what you once wrote?

OT: In your current signature you claim to have “an affair with the bootstrap”. Really an affair? I mean, does it respond to your love? Or is it just calf love?

[image]All the best,
Helmut Schütz 
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,394 Posts in 3,725 Threads, 1,071 registered users;
29 users online (0 registered, 29 guests).

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed