in vivo data before tweaking in vitro [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-06-24 21:30 (2496 d 06:31 ago) – Posting: # 17501
Views: 7,629

Hi Kiran,

a generic product must demonstrate BE in the rate (Cmax) and extent of absorption (AUC), right?
If your dissolution method is not predictive (you can’t tell before you have in vivo data!) any difference might – or might not – be relevant.
Run a small pilot study to get an idea. IMHO, it is a waste of time to first tweak the dissolution which possibly was overdiscriminatory.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
111 visitors (1 registered, 110 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5