Russian «Экс­пер­тами» following the EEU GLs [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Beholder  – Russia, 2017-05-25 00:37 (3305 d 19:28 ago) – Posting: # 17410
Views: 33,413

Hello Helmut!

❝ Does any of our Russian members know whether the above was ever accepted? This section talks about giving in the report a justification for not performing such an analysis. Has anybody ever tried to give the justification already in the protocol? If yes, what happened? If no, why not?


You are citing too fresh doc I think. The doc came into force on 6th of May. So strictly speaking it was not obligatory to use draft of the doc during clinical trial conducting before 6th of May. So, nobody used it I think and no experience was gathered.

But I would try it))

If Im not mistaken, you wrote something about such algorithm somewhere in forum but I could not find it.

Best regards
Beholder

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
129 visitors (0 registered, 129 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5