FDA: If RSABE not recommended in product-specific guidance [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-23 15:15 (2523 d 13:34 ago) – Posting: # 17394
Views: 4,668

Salam Mahmoud,

❝ The problem here is that literature data archiving the PKs and output of previous BE studies on simvastatin show border ISV with CV around 30% (29% - 33%).


❝ On the contrary, till the moment, the FDA guidance for BE study on Simvastatin doesn't involve reference scaling https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm089636.pdf


Note that this guidance was recommended in August 2008 – way before the FDA considered reference scaling acceptable (Progesterone, April 2010).

❝ Does the BE study of Simvastatin involve reference scaling due the border ISV of simvastatin derived from literature though the regulator doesn't imply that?


Until the FDA updates the product-specific guidance, it is still worthwhile to give it a try. See the draft guidance “Bioequivalence Studies with Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Drugs Submitted Under an ANDA” lines 119–121 and footnote 10. For the FDA you have to submit the protocol for review anyway. See also Section VI.B. of “ANDA Submissions – Refuse-to-Receive Standards”.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,653 registered users;
73 visitors (0 registered, 73 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5