Regulations ≠ Science [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-19 16:07 (2505 d 18:55 ago) – Posting: # 17373
Views: 6,369

Hi Averroes,

❝ […] the GMR constrant is there for political reasons more than for scienfic or statistical reasons.


Exactly. Suggested by Les Benet.

❝ Do you think we could still have an opportunity with European regulatory agencies?


I’m always happy to challenge regulatory practices. But in this case the chances to succeed are close to nil. IMHO, even trying is a complete waste of time. Alfredo will never, ever buy it.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
110 visitors (0 registered, 110 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:02 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5