Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 03:43 CEST

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

TRT / RTR Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-06 18:33  - Posting: # 17312
Views: 3,259

Hi ElMaestro & Yura,

» But having said that I think the sentence is OK, only the meaning is a bit out of context.

Right. It appears in the introduction about the FDA’s RSABE. Nothing like that in the next paragraph about the EMA’s ABEL. The GL states only the periods (three or four) and no specific designs/sequences. In the Q&A the RTRT|TRTR and the RRT|RTR|TRR are given as examples. In Rev. 12 of the Q&A the TRT|RTR is discussed (requiring at least 12 subject in sequence RTR).

» Blumentopferde :cool:

Love it!

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
18,698 posts in 3,983 threads, 1,236 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 10 identified bots]).

When puzzled, it never hurts to read the primary documents –
a rather simple and self-evident principle that has, nonetheless,
completely disappeared from large sectors
of the American experience.    Stephen Jay Gould

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed