TRT / RTR Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-06 18:33  – Posting: # 17312
Views: 6,091

Hi ElMaestro & Yura,

» But having said that I think the sentence is OK, only the meaning is a bit out of context.

Right. It appears in the introduction about the FDA’s RSABE. Nothing like that in the next paragraph about the EMA’s ABEL. The GL states only the periods (three or four) and no specific designs/sequences. In the Q&A the RTRT|TRTR and the RRT|RTR|TRR are given as examples. In Rev. 12 of the Q&A the TRT|RTR is discussed (requiring at least 12 subject in sequence RTR).

» Blumentopferde :cool:

Love it!

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,607 posts in 4,159 threads, 1,340 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 05:34 CEST

Every sentence I utter must be understood
not as an affirmation
but as a question.    Niels Bohr

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5