TRT / RTR Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-05-04 00:04 (2539 d 23:59 ago) – Posting: # 17303
Views: 8,658

Hi Hötzi,

❝ ❝ "The approach of reference-scaled average BE (RSABE) requires that the reference formulation be measured twice in each subject."

❝ … slipped through my intention. My fault. This statement is – despite the two great authors – wrong.


Not your fault. As a reviewer you are not and will never be responsible for anything authored by others. :ok:

But having said that I think the sentence is OK, only the meaning is a bit out of context. To calculate meaningfully the intra-subject variability for Ref we need subjects in whom it has been measured (at least) twice. That was presumably what the authors tried to remind readers.
The entire issue of rsaBE cannot be approached in the absence of such subjects, and therefore the sentence makes quite some sense.

Blumentopferde :cool:
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,652 registered users;
50 visitors (0 registered, 50 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5