TRT / RTR Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-05-03 22:04  – Posting: # 17303
Views: 5,449

Hi Hötzi,

» » "The approach of reference-scaled average BE (RSABE) requires that the reference formulation be measured twice in each subject."
» … slipped through my intention. My fault. This statement is – despite the two great authors – wrong.

Not your fault. As a reviewer you are not and will never be responsible for anything authored by others. :ok:

But having said that I think the sentence is OK, only the meaning is a bit out of context. To calculate meaningfully the intra-subject variability for Ref we need subjects in whom it has been measured (at least) twice. That was presumably what the authors tried to remind readers.
The entire issue of rsaBE cannot be approached in the absence of such subjects, and therefore the sentence makes quite some sense.

Blumentopferde :cool:

if (3) 4

x=c("Foo", "Bar")
b=data.frame(x)
typeof(b[,1]) ##aha, integer?
b[,1]+1 ##then let me add 1



Best regards,
ElMaestro

"(...) targeted cancer therapies will benefit fewer than 2 percent of the cancer patients they’re aimed at. That reality is often lost on consumers, who are being fed a steady diet of winning anecdotes about miracle cures." New York Times (ed.), June 9, 2018.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,267 posts in 4,098 threads, 1,314 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 8 identified bots]).

That which is not controversial
is of no particular interest.    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5